The chart, simply conceived yet profoundly meaningful, illustrates an eye-catching phenomenon: there are various distinct factors responsible for consumers choosing a restaurant in a certain city. From the data offered, it is easy for us to identify the substantial proportion of feature: it tops all the categories for 36.3%. Next to it come the environment and the service, representing 27.8% and 26.8% respectively. Meanwhile, we may not marvel at the fact that price and others are relatively low, merely 8.4% and 4.7% separately.

　　From where I am standing, a variety of factors could offer clarifications of this phenomenon, as listed below. To begin with, thanks to the advance of our living standard, an expanding number of families are better off and capable of affording dining out. Additionally, they may not be sensible to the price compared to decades ago. Lastly, along with the boom in the third industry, it is no wonder that the emergent emphasis on the feature, the increasing demand of the service quality as well as the growing pursuit of the environment are put a premium on.

　　In the light of the previous analysis, a sensible conclusion can be drawn safely that the feature of this scenario is far from unacceptable and therefore normal. Accordingly, it is of pivotal necessity for us to acknowledge and further reasonably treat this phenomenon which would definitely be seen in the foreseeable future.